Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Carter's avatar

First, personal definitions/impressions.

Post-liberals seem basically be just classical liberals distancing themselves from the woke, who are also post-liberal in any meaningful sense. Most of what I've seen from them is critique of wokeness (which is great), and a vague desire to return to the glory days of 1993 (which is ... unlikely).

NatCons seem to basically be CivNats, which I find to be an incoherent ideology. A nation-state is organized around a nation, which is to say an ethnos, not a creed. CivNats suggest that a Sri Lankan who believes in the American Constitution etc. is just as American as anyone else ... But does a descendent of the Mayflower pilgrims cease to be American if they disagree with the Constitution?

On policy ... This is certainly too much for a comment, but. The core problem we face right now is demographic deflation. Exploitation of female labor has led to low birth rates, with immigration then being necessary to maintain population growth. I'm skeptical that welfare-type programs, eg parental leave, can address this. In addition to being expensive, such policies have already been tried in many countries without really moving the needle on birth rates very much.

Historically it was never the case that most women didn't work and just sat around pregnant all day minding the kids. I don't think women want to do that, either. People want to feel useful, not just to their family but to society. However, it was the case that the economic activity women engaged in tended to be that which was compatible with having small children running around. Household businesses, in other words. We're already seeing a shift to work-from-home driven by information technology and people's preferences, so that seems to me like a policy lever the state could lean on: encourage small household businesses, via tax policy and regulatory changes, while also encouraging a flex-time attitude towards WFH jobs such that women can more easily balance the chaos of demanding children with the demands of economic production, fitting the latter into the gaps that open in the former as they can. This would enable women to work and care for their kids simultaneously; would revive the civic life in residential communities; would almost certainly increase the birth rate since professional and family responsibilities would no longer be diametrically opposed; and would therefore attenuate the necessity for culturally disruptive levels of immigration.

Expand full comment
Simon Cooke's avatar

https://open.substack.com/pub/simoncooke/p/make-conservativism-great-again-a?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android Helen is bang on the money on the policy issue. I wrote about the lack of economic strategy in National Conservatism.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts