Well reasoned essay, looking forward to part 2. It might be useful to consider cultural factors as well. The West seems to have drifted toward placing females in roles that hasn't happened in other cultures. Perhaps prosperity itself has created conditions where feminisation is possible. Fat, dumb and happy isn't a positive for the futur…
Well reasoned essay, looking forward to part 2. It might be useful to consider cultural factors as well. The West seems to have drifted toward placing females in roles that hasn't happened in other cultures. Perhaps prosperity itself has created conditions where feminisation is possible. Fat, dumb and happy isn't a positive for the future.
The redefinition of marriage has always been troublesome to me. My concept was it was based on ensuring children had protection from the two people responsible for their creation and society was then organized to support that concept. Same sex marriage defies that convention but might make sense where an excess of orphans might exist. OTOH, to my mind the combination of female/male thought patterns and goals seems to build a strong union. Don't think same sex minds can overcome biology; can males have female thinking? We see males pretending to be female but their walk is always odd given anatomy.
Given homosexuals tends to be cognitively cross-grained, the difference might not be as big as one might expect. Same-sex marriage has a wider history than folk realise.
I am actually more concerned about the treating of fathers and husbands within family law, in part from feminism’s self-indulgent valorisation of women as (in effect) a superior form of Homo sapien. I am also bothered by the use of trans to undermine parental authority.
In my days in the late 60's we had among our bar regulars, a gay couple would be participating in the food and drink. They were regular diners arriving after work as many of us did. They were a well accepted couple and might have been solid parents had they been allowed. Can't speak to their thinking patterns; they were in their 40's, normal chatter.
And I had a friend who had a custody battle, I think pure spite on her part.
Well reasoned essay, looking forward to part 2. It might be useful to consider cultural factors as well. The West seems to have drifted toward placing females in roles that hasn't happened in other cultures. Perhaps prosperity itself has created conditions where feminisation is possible. Fat, dumb and happy isn't a positive for the future.
The redefinition of marriage has always been troublesome to me. My concept was it was based on ensuring children had protection from the two people responsible for their creation and society was then organized to support that concept. Same sex marriage defies that convention but might make sense where an excess of orphans might exist. OTOH, to my mind the combination of female/male thought patterns and goals seems to build a strong union. Don't think same sex minds can overcome biology; can males have female thinking? We see males pretending to be female but their walk is always odd given anatomy.
Given homosexuals tends to be cognitively cross-grained, the difference might not be as big as one might expect. Same-sex marriage has a wider history than folk realise.
I am actually more concerned about the treating of fathers and husbands within family law, in part from feminism’s self-indulgent valorisation of women as (in effect) a superior form of Homo sapien. I am also bothered by the use of trans to undermine parental authority.
In my days in the late 60's we had among our bar regulars, a gay couple would be participating in the food and drink. They were regular diners arriving after work as many of us did. They were a well accepted couple and might have been solid parents had they been allowed. Can't speak to their thinking patterns; they were in their 40's, normal chatter.
And I had a friend who had a custody battle, I think pure spite on her part.