A very interesting story, however there is something which you don't seem to have addressed, and that is the charge of plagiarism against you at the time. I wonder how that has affected you personally and professionally.
A very interesting story, however there is something which you don't seem to have addressed, and that is the charge of plagiarism against you at the time. I wonder how that has affected you personally and professionally.
Your comment illustrates why it has to be covered separately - you're referring (accurately, by the way) to the 2017 incident, which of course is the only one the internet remembers. Kenn, however, is referring to something that actually happened in 1995 (and which would have had serious consequences had it been true).
However, the internet has forgotten that one, despite it genuinely being a more important story.
That's going to be the subject of a separate post, as there's an entirely unrelated 2017 incident that needs to be discussed as part of it that I can't reasonably address in a piece focussed on 1995-6.
A very interesting story, however there is something which you don't seem to have addressed, and that is the charge of plagiarism against you at the time. I wonder how that has affected you personally and professionally.
Your comment illustrates why it has to be covered separately - you're referring (accurately, by the way) to the 2017 incident, which of course is the only one the internet remembers. Kenn, however, is referring to something that actually happened in 1995 (and which would have had serious consequences had it been true).
However, the internet has forgotten that one, despite it genuinely being a more important story.
That's going to be the subject of a separate post, as there's an entirely unrelated 2017 incident that needs to be discussed as part of it that I can't reasonably address in a piece focussed on 1995-6.
It will all be in there eventually!