I don't understand either this comment or the use of "accuse"in the article. What is wrong with a State providing basic levels of care and support for the people who live in it? I'd use the word "accuse" for those States that don't.
I don't understand either this comment or the use of "accuse"in the article. What is wrong with a State providing basic levels of care and support for the people who live in it? I'd use the word "accuse" for those States that don't.
When I used the word "accuse", I was taking a pop at libertarians who do use it in this way, but also ahistorically (forgetting the distribution restrictions in place). I think libertarians are very silly. I can't speak for the other commenter, as I can't read his mind.
I don't understand either this comment or the use of "accuse"in the article. What is wrong with a State providing basic levels of care and support for the people who live in it? I'd use the word "accuse" for those States that don't.
When I used the word "accuse", I was taking a pop at libertarians who do use it in this way, but also ahistorically (forgetting the distribution restrictions in place). I think libertarians are very silly. I can't speak for the other commenter, as I can't read his mind.
Thanks, Helen - I realised after I'd walked away from the phone that was how you'd intended it to be read!